Responding to COVID19: Now and in the long-term.

The past months and even more so the past few weeks have been challenging for educators on an unprecedented scale. As COVID19 continues to spread both as a global pandemic of a medical nature and as the almost singular focus of social media, education has confronted change on a scale we might never have imagined. Amidst the very real threat to our health and to the safety of our families, teachers have risen to the challenge of reinventing overnight what school is and what it looks like to be a teacher. 

At this point in time, most of us have dove into the deep and murky waters of online learning. For some, this means that all students are working remotely. For others, there is the double challenge of providing for remote learners while also meeting the needs of those who are still attending in person. Some are in lockdown, restricted to their homes and under intense police surveillance, others with varying degrees of liberty. Regardless, we all confront an uncertain future. Timeframes provided by experts vary enormously and it can be hard to see a light at the end of this tunnel. 

"All that was 'normal' has now evaporated; we have entered postnormal times, the in-between period where old orthodoxies are dying, new ones have not yet emerged, and nothing really makes sense." - Sardar, Z. "Welcome to postnormal times”

I have shared this quote from Sardar often, but it seems more real now than ever. There is very little ‘normal’ in the ways we are living our lives, connecting with loved ones, running our households and, for teachers and students, how we are engaging in learning. 

Change in schools is always challenging, but at this point, it seems it is also absolute, unavoidable and urgent. Many educators have been on a slow journey towards models of education that integrate seamlessly with an online world. There have always been those who rapidly embrace technology and those who see it as a threat to their identity or a shiny add-on with little proven value. Now, online learning is very rapidly becoming the norm. This brings with it very real tensions, many of which are yet to be seen in full. These are early days and while teachers are doing an amazing job of learning to swim in this new world of online learning, many will be longing to a return to the modes of teaching they know best. If the need for online learning continues beyond the scope of weeks and extends into months, as many have predicted, we can predict greater challenges. 

Teacher identity is closely linked to our role as teachers and our perception of that role is reflected in our pedagogy. Where the intended change alters the nature of our pedagogy and fundamentally shifts the relationships between teachers and students, and between teachers and knowledge resistance is more likely. Smollan and Sayers indicate the importance of understanding the socially constructed nature of identity and the potentially negative impact that change can have on this for individuals, 'that change ‘dislodges’ identity and leads to anxiety and grieving’ (Smollan & Sayers. 2009 p439) it is difficult to predict how this forced change is likely to impact teacher identity in the long term, however, a degree of grief for what has been lost seems inevitable. 

Educational organisations with their focus on the provision of human services and the inherent relationships between teacher and student and between teachers, creates a complex emotional playground. In schools, emotion and culture are linked, and change of culture frequently invokes an emotional response. “A person’s sense of identity is partly determined by his or her values, which can mesh or clash with organizational values” (Smollan & Sayers 2009 p439) When cultural change is sought in a school and it is not viewed as fitting with one’s values or it calls those values into question emotional responses such as fear, anger or sadness are common. The rapid nature of this change has, at least in many schools and at least in the short term, prohibited the normal processes and norms which accompany significant change. The process of planning, programming and resourcing units of learning, is typically lengthy, involves many stakeholders and much debate. The result, when everything works, is a sequence of planned learning opportunities that are tightly aligned with the teacher’s core beliefs about teaching. Whether this is a belief in the primacy of direct instruction, inquiry-based learning, teaching for understanding, a Reggio Emilia approach or another signature pedagogy, the experiences planned for students by teachers should be in alignment. In the rush to get content online, this process has been derailed and the short-term responses do not reflect the best our profession is capable of, even if they represent an exceptional response under the most challenging of circumstances. 

At some point, we will need to pause. Lift our heads up and survey the scenery in this new world. Then, let us hope that we ask the right questions. Making time and space for a moment of pause and reflection will be crucial if it becomes clear that this is more than a brief fling with online learning. In this moment of pause, we must go back to the fundamental questions that shape our beliefs about learning. These questions should shape how we organise learning in an online world as much as they do when we are teaching face-to-face. 

  • What do I want my students to understand here?

  • What might they already understand about this? What gaps might there be in their understanding? How might I make this visible in an online environment? What obstacles block students from showing their understanding that I can remove? e.g not requiring a written response.

  • What experiences might allow them to achieve this and then demonstrate it?

  • As I evaluate the activities I have planned for my students:

  • Do they move students towards this understanding?

    1. What understanding does this activity require?

    2. What evidence of understanding does this provide?

  • How do I fill gaps? Questions, Prompts, Provocations, Direct Instruction, Feedforward.

  • What thinking will they require for this task? How might I scaffold that? How do I make it visible in an online environment?

  • What next?

And, now perhaps more than ever, as we confront fear and uncertainty, we will all need a sense of agency empowered by capacities required to activate or perform our intentions (Clapp et al 2010). "This entails thinking about the world not as something that unfolds separate and apart from us but as a field of action that we can potentially direct and influence” (Ritchhart p. 77). They must become creative problem finders through learning opportunities that allow them to "sense that there is a puzzle somewhere or a task to be accomplished" (Csikszentmihalyi p. 95) and respond strategically, creatively and collaboratively towards solutions devised with empathy and a long-term view of impacts and real-costs (Kelley). Our students must be shown the value of acquiring deep-understandings through weaving ideas together, going beyond information and figuring things out (Ritchhart).

This demands that our students are routinely engaged with learning that requires them to do thought-provoking things with what they know, such as considering different viewpoints, reasoning with evidence, uncovering complexity and building explanations (Clapp et al) (Blythe). Such complex thinking does not occur automatically, and our students will need to master structures which support this. Visible thinking strategies assist teachers to make deep thinking a routine part of their classrooms and allow them to 'see' the way their learners are engaging with ideas (Clapp et al). All learning is a consequence of thinking and schools must transform themselves into "cultures of thinking” (Ritchhart). This demands a continual evaluation of the culture that is experienced by students and teachers. We must come to value thinking in all its forms and appreciate that our collective futures depend upon the quality of our thinking.

What is most clear to anyone with an understanding of the scale of the challenge educators are confronting is that this is a profession with immense reserves of talent and wisdom. Amidst such great chaos and confronted by a very real threat to their safety, teachers have reinvented what schools look like in a matter of days. Now, we need to be granted the time to step back from the immediacy of our overnight response and plan how we move forward with plans that will best serve the needs of our learners in the longer term. While we hope and pray that we might return to more normal times, the learning that has occurred in the past weeks seems to offer an opportunity too good to be missed. Moving forward this seems like the perfect time to reflect upon what might be the best possible model for education. A chance to restore that which we miss most from our previous models while retaining what we value in the new. 

By Nigel Coutts

Blythe, T. (1998) "The teaching for understanding guide”, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013) "Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention”, New York, Harper Perennial.

Clapp, E., Ross, J., Oxman Ryan, J. & Tishman, S. (2017) "Maker-centered learning: empowering young people to shape their worlds”, San Francisco, Josey Bass

Kelley, D. (2013)  "Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All”, London, Harper Collins.

[4] Ritchhart, R. (2015) "Creating cultures of thinking: The eight forces we must truly master to transform our schools”, San Francisco, Josey-Bass.

Sardar, Z. (2010) "Welcome to postnormal times”, Futures, 42(5), p. 435-444.

Smollan, R & Sayers, J. (2009) Organizational Culture, Change and Emotions: A Qualitative Study, Journal of Change Management, 9:4, 435-457

What skills might our students most need beyond school?

It is tempting to make predictions of the skills that our students will need beyond their time at school. Such wondering can be a useful guide as we contemplate what we shall focus on with our curriculum. Unsurprisingly, there is no shortage of predictions for future skillsets published by educators, economists and analysts. What might we learn from such lists, and how should education systems respond?

Last week I considered the question of how we prepare for unknown unknowns. Those who seek to gaze into the future are hoping that the conditions we see in the economy and the worlds of work and society today are reliable indicators for the trends of tomorrow. The number of such reports seems to be increasing, and the frequency at which they are updated appears to be shortening. It appears that these are indeed postnormal times when the pace of change is such that predictions of the future have a short lifespan. Sardar describes these “postnormal times” as “Ours is a transitional age, a time without the confidence that we can return to any past we have known and with no confidence in any path to a desirable, attainable or sustainable future.” (Sardar, 2010)

The volatile and unpredictable nature of our current times is reflected in the titles of the research papers which seek to predict how education systems might best respond. The Australian Secondary Principals’ Association (ASPA) commissioned “Beyond Certainty: A process for thinking about futures for Australian education”. Economists, PWC have published a range of articles including “A Smart Move” in 2015 with an emphasis on the importance of STEAM disciplines and more recently “Workforce of the Future: The competing forces shaping 2030” that suggests we may have beyond a STEAM driven imperative. The Foundation For Young Australians (FYA) has published numerous papers with titles such as “The new work basics”, “The new work smarts” and “The new work mindset” emphasising that the world of work is changing for young people and that flexibility in these times of ‘newness’ is essential. A report prepared for the NSW Department of Education on the critical implications for school education of artificial intelligence and other emerging transformations was titled “Preparing for the best and worst of times” playing on the fear and promise of modern times. 

Perhaps the most prolific predictor of future times is the World Economic Forum. On an almost annual basis, they have published a series of predictions for the world of work in the short and near future. These reports show a subtle and consistent shift in the skills predicted to be of most value and the trend is most certainly towards flexible, adaptable skills and lifelong learning. The results of the 2018 “Future of Jobs Report” is summarised in the image below.

Click image to enlarge.

The clear pattern is that the ability to solve complex problems with critical and creative thinking skills continues as do the importance of active learning and learning strategies. If the WEF is right, our young people will need to be analytical thinkers who innovate, understand complex systems and possess emotional intelligence and leadership capabilities. On the decline, by contrast, are skills for memorisation, management, technology use and base skills for reading, writing, math and the darling of so many classrooms “active listening”. 

Skills continuing to grow in prominence by 2022 include analytical thinking and innovation as well as active learning and learning strategies.
World Economic Forum - The Future of Jobs Report 2018

The continued emphasis on the skills of “Active learning and learning strategies” is significant. In times of change, the ability to learn, unlearn and relearn is crucial. This was predicted by Alvin Toffler’s 1970 text “Future Shock” where he wrote:

“By instructing students how to learn, unlearn and relearn, a powerful new dimension can be added to education… Tomorrow’s illiterate will not be the man who can’t read; he will be the man who has not learned how to learn.” (Toffler. 1970 p211)

This is also noted by Professor Alan Reid, the author of the ASPA’s “Beyond Certainty” report who points to the importance of “meta-learning” alongside general capabilities and a contemporary curriculum comprising disciplinary and interdisciplinary learning. Indeed learning is described by Reid as “a key to living in the 21st century”, and an understanding of learning is deemed crucial. 

Meta-learning is the capacity to understand oneself as a learner and the process of learning. It goes beyond metacognition, taking in new understandings about learning in fields as disparate as neuroscience and the functioning of the brain, emotional, sensory and social learning, cognitive psychology, and learning and physical movement. Learning about learning is fundamental in an information/knowledge society where knowledge is expanding at an exponential rate. (Reid. 2018 p6)

By acknowledging the importance of learning to learn and with that the capacity to be self-navigating learners, these reports recognise that the future is assuredly full of unknown unknowns. The best preparation for such a future is to own the capacity to learn and even teach oneself fresh skills on demand. Rather than developing a specific skills set adaptability is the key to success in an ever-changing future, and it is adaptability that PWC describes as “the key to the future”.

One clear lesson arises from our analysis: adaptability – in organisations, individuals and society – is essential for navigating the changes ahead. It’s impossible to predict exactly the skills that will be needed even five years from now, so workers and organisations need to be ready to adapt (PWC. 2018 p31)

What then are the implications for schools? How do we ensure that our students are presented with opportunities to understand how they learn and to take charge of their learning? How do we do this in a culture of standardised testing and an overcrowded curriculum that allows little time for deeply reflective meta-learning as described by Professor Reid? When will our students experience and engage in genuine creative problem solving that requires innovation and critical thinking? Will these be a part of their time in schools or will they be put on hold and first experienced by young people as they enter the world of work?

By Nigel Coutts

PWC (2018). Workforce of the Future: The competing forces shaping 2030. PWC

Reid, A. (2018). Beyond Certainty: A process for thinking about futures for Australian education. Australian Secondary Principals’ Association (ASPA)

Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.

World Economic Forum (2018) - The Future of Jobs Report 2018. Centre for the New Economy and Society